Talk:Capote (garment)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Created page Capote (garment) over re-direct.Kayoty 06:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Stack Reference

@Steelbeard: Please look at the references section. The full citation details are already given to the Stack reference at the bottom, there is no need to have it twice. This is a perfectly normal way of handling multiple references to different parts of the same source and reduces clutter in edit mode. On the link to google books, strictly speaking this is unnecessary as gbooks can be reached through clicking the ISBN link (along with the several other resources). However, if you are going to have gbook links you should have them for all instances of citations to the book. A common way of doing that is to turn the page number in the citations to a link that leads to the actual page being cited. SpinningSpark 12:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Steelbeard1: pinging again with right username this time. SpinningSpark 12:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinningspark: OTOH, the ISBN link you mentioned DOES NOT provide a direct link to the supporting chapter of the book. That was why I inserted the direct link in the first place. I did correct the erroneous citation and removed redundant ones. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In what way was it erroneous? You might not like the way I cited it, but it was certainly not incorrect as far as I can see. See WP:CITEVAR. SpinningSpark 16:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You had already stated that the editor of the book was erroneously credited as the author of the quoted passage. So I made sure that the LINKED citation gave proper credit to Stack. Steelbeard1 (talk) 17:17, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capote (garment). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140308030518/http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/onlineExhibit/southesk/redRiver_fireBag.cfm to http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/onlineExhibit/southesk/redRiver_fireBag.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]