Talk:Capital punishment debate in the United States
Daily page views
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Problem in Deterrence Section
[edit]The sentence that begins "Naci Mocan, an economist at Louisiana State University,..." appears to be incomplete, and ends with the end of an unintroduced quotation from someone named Shepard.Dr hilto (talk) 03:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Most researches have found deterrent effect of Death Penalty?
[edit]It seems that most researches on the deterrence of the Death Penalty have found some deterrent effects of the Death Penalty, and much less of them didn't find or was inconclusive.
see this: http://www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/dpdeterrence.htm
--EPN-001GF IZEN བཀྲ་ཤིས་བདེ་ལེགས། 08:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- CJLF is not a reliable source for anything but its own views. The list can easily be a case of cherry picking and/or the interpetations of the results of the studies mentioned wrong. --Saddhiyama (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Capital punishment debate in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203428/http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=2165 to http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=2165
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Costs
[edit]Death penalty cases cost more because of all the bleeding hearts that drag the case and its appeals out ad nauseum. 199.112.128.15 (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Capital punishment debate in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123105704/http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/DPIC.htm to http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/DPIC.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050404011836/http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/ to http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Edits regarding brutalization without sources
[edit]@JoeSmoe2828: I reverted your edits involving brutalization to this article because you failed to cite any sources to support your claims as required by the Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:Verifiability. I then notified you on your talk page that reverted your edits and that if you wished to publish these edits, you would need to cite a reliable source for claims. Instead you just undid my revert. Please provide reliable sources for your claims. Wikipedialuva (talk) 02:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Wikipedialuva: Hi Wikipedialuva. I'm sorry for reverting your edit without sources. I just added a couple citations about brutalization. JoeSmoe2828 (talk) 21:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Bias
[edit]This page seemed to be very bias, its more to the opposition side to the death penalty. Where are the Pro death penalty points. Muaza Husni (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)