Talk:Capital Crescent Trail

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hiking trails (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hiking trails, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Hiking trailsWikipedia:WikiProject Hiking trailsTemplate:WikiProject Hiking trailsHiking trails articles

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

External link - savethetrail.org

I don't think that link is appropriately added to this article at this time and have removed it for the second time. For better or for worse the current Purple Line controversy is not mentioned at all here - it is instead (pretty extensively) discussed at Purple Line (Maryland). That article, it should be noted, has plenty of advocacy links, on both sides of the issue, but there they serve to round out a discussion, in the article, that lays out both sides of the issue. Here the link is a non sequitur. Until there is something here to give the link context, it just looks like POV pushing to me. (If I find time I will try to add something here about the Purple Line (certainly it is pertinent to the CCT's future) but it may be a while and I'm not sure I really know enough about the whole thing to do a creditable job.) Please do not reintroduce the link without discussing it here. JohnInDC (talk) 01:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For better or worse I had nothing to do with the posting of that link in question, and I won't get involved in the revision war by reposting it, but I must say it sounds at least semi-relevant and therefore the link should not have been removed. People who aren't interested in the link simply won't follow it, and I see no probablem with having an expansive list of links at some section at the end. In comparison, the academic literature is often full of tangential links, and rightfully so because it makes the literature easier to navigate using the citation index, including searching the citation index by reverse-links. (IE you find new results by looking for all papers citing an older paper you know about.) The google index makes use of the link-structure of the web, so search engines do this in spades.

173.66.241.122 (talk) 15:19, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo out of date

The top photo of the trail in Bethesda is now out of date. The section of the trail shown, and the vantage spot from which it was taken, now skirt a construction site in a slightly realigned corridor enclosed within plywood hoardings. When the construction has finished - in around 2 years - the trail will run directly alongside a large mixed use retail / condominium development. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.136.23 (talk) 04:20, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone include more detailed remarks about smoothness of the pavement

The article has a one-word mention of rollerblading, which isn't sufficiently helpful in my case.

Often people who have never roller-bladed before claim that trails are available for rollerblading, but when you actually go out to try it you find they aren't: For a trail to be truly usable for rollerblading it needs to be extremely smooth, or else the vibrations make your knees hurt in 10 minutes are less. For example, cement with lots of small rocks in it is unacceptable for rollerblading, although bikers won't even notice. If there are lots of twigs and dirt around then things can become dangerous as well, as if it is crowded with biker who often pass into the oncoming lane without realizing the difficulty that rollerbladers may have avoiding them safely. Brick pavement is completely unrollerbladeable, because rollerblade brakes don't work on bricks. (That isn't because of lack of friction, but rather that you can't actually hold the brake down when the small brick cracks keep making the skate rotate forward.)

Could someone who has actually tried rollerblading on the trail please comment about the pavement conditions and such? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.241.122 (talk) 15:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although some folks might find the information useful, it's not really in line with the purpose of Wikipedia, which is as an encyclopedia and not as a product or service review site. Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not is a little preachy but gives a good sense of this. Consistent with this mission, Wikipedia is also intended to include material that can be tied back to a reliable third party source. If, then, a rollerblading publication had assessed the trail for that purpose and had written an article about it or included it in a ranking, then maybe that reference could find its way here - but failing that, any discussion here of the suitability of the CCT for rollerblading would be the editor's personal opinion, based on his / her own experience, and as such not be suitable for inclusion. I hope this is helpful! JohnInDC (talk) 14:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Capital Crescent Trail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Capital Crescent Trail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Capital Crescent Trail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]