Talk:Cap badge

MILHIST initial assessment

Despite having the beginning s of article structure, the article is needs references to qualify for start. The coverage also seems somewhat random and it would be worth stopping to think about future direction. To cover a wide range of national armed services and police forces at the level of the British entry would take a lot of work. Should the article try to be generic without a great deal of national detail?Monstrelet (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Wearing of two cap badges

Can someone who has served in 2 different regiments wear both cap badges on a beret as a civilian? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.152.123.101 (talk) 17:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cap badge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150206210653/http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/Rifles_Dress_Guidance__2013_Srl_10.pdf to http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/Rifles_Dress_Guidance__2013_Srl_10.pdf#search=beret
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050226234107/http://history.farmersboys.com:80/RGBW/r_g_b_w__insigna.htm to http://history.farmersboys.com/RGBW/r_g_b_w__insigna.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)