Talk:Canucks Sports & Entertainment

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Canucks Sports & Entertainment or Canucks Sports and Entertainment

Canucks Sports & Entertainment is correct if you look at the press release. In the title they used & and in the opening paragraph, the bolded text is Canucks Sports & Entertainment. Release -Phatc00kie (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. My concern is that we should establish if the use of "&" reflects the legal name, or if it is just a stylistic touch. I've seen references to both, but one in particular (this legal text for a contest run by the company) suggests that the legal name uses "and". Thoughts? --Ckatz^chat _spy 05:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose both are being used, but I think we should go with the one in the official press release regarding the name change. In another press release, it also uses both the "&" and "and". -Phatc00kie (talk) 01:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Canucks Sports & Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080130124136/http://canucks.nhl.com:80/team/app/?service=page&page=NewsPage&articleid=351603 to http://canucks.nhl.com/team/app/?service=page&page=NewsPage&articleid=351603
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=167a083c-da89-4e06-9ada-5eb84c6941a0&sponsor=
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.team1040.ca/news/story/?id=2031

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]