Talk:Canton Synagogue/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 00:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opening statement

In reviews I conduct, I may make small copyedits. These will only be limited to spelling and punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. For replying to Reviewer comment, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. —♠Vami _IV†♠ 00:19, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

~~Footnote C is lacking a citation.~~
- Added
~~What happened to the synagogue between 1917 and 1968? Surely it was abused during the Second World War?~~
- Not done Unfortunately, none of the sources I have consulted thus far go into detail about what happened to the ghetto during the Second World War, let alone what happened to any of the synagogues. My plan is to go consult the archives of the local Jewish library, but I don't know when I will be able to do that. Markhole (talk) 09:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'll mark this off then. –♠Vami _IV†♠ 23:22, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~the synagogue in accessed is accessed?~~
- Fixed
~~Link to the prescribed Bible verses in Footnote G as Gerda Arendt has done here.~~
- Done
~~such feature, characteristic of Venetian domestic Replace "such" with "this", or insert an "a" between the first two highlighted words.~~
- Fixed
~~"Architecture" should be subdivided. Make an "interior" section, and talk about the dimensions of the synagogue under the main header.~~
- Done

GA progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.