Talk:Canterbury United Dragons

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canterbury United Dragons article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Canterbury United Dragons be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Fair use rationale for Image:CULogo.jpg

Image:CULogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NZFC 2004/05 - Canterbury played extra home game (Pt.1)

Quote: Originally Posted by henryo Did anyone noticed that Canterbury United has actually played 12 home games in 2004/05 season? The same is also confirmed at RSSSF.com.

Is this a mistake? Was thinking that each team should play up to a max. of 11 games at home during a 21-game season.

Have emailed NZFC.CO.NZ since last year but no firm reply yet, although it was mentioned that "they did play Auckland in Nelson that year which would have been counted as a home game for Canterbury (in Round 17 which they lost 0-3)".

Can anyone help?

NZFC 2004/05 - Canterbury played extra home game (Pt.2)

At the end of 2007/08 (4th season), where every team should have played equal number (42) of Home/Away games, Canterbury will again play 1 more home game than others, while Waikato play 1 less.

It was the same case at the end of 2005/06 (2nd season), where all else played 21 Home/Away, Canterbury played 22 while Waikato played just 20 at Home.

Even if their game with Auckland is switched, Waikato would have still played 1 less Home Game , while Auckland played 1 more instead.

So I guess there're more errors in the 2004/05 fixtures, or even 2005/06?