Jump to content

Talk:Cantabrian Wars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Update

[edit]

I updated the article with information about the Astur campaigns and the Bellum Asturicum - --Ravenloft 12:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cantabrian" Labarum"

[edit]

Are you sure that the "lábaro cántabro" as we know it nowadays is the same standard flown by the Cantabrian tribesmen two thousand years ago? Let's better say that the current "lábaro" is based on ancient Cantabrian burial stone monuments or so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 10:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mons Medullium

[edit]

Mons Medullium? Astur? This article is so wrong. Galaics, Asturians and Cantabrians fought together at the Medullium, in Gallaecia. The Gallaeci were defeated almost all at that point. Asturians and Cantabrians keep fighting some more years, as the last spanish resitance. Here says "Astur went to Medullium...", that's wrong, a manipulation. The all three celtic tribes fought there, and the eastern two came to the west to help de Gallaeci in a heroic act. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.146.20.246 (talk) 22:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cantabrian Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cantabrian Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cantabrian Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Flags"

[edit]

I've gone and removed these two "Flags" - the first one seems to be an Anachronistic flag for Cantabrian nationalism (20th century?), while the other one is not present on any other Wikipedia page which could explain its context. While i love flags in infoboxes, we should refrain from inventing flags or using them in an anachronistic fashion. Koopinator (talk) 10:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]