Talk:Canon FD lens mount

Should there really be any need to have a separate article for every single FD lens? There's an "article" link for each entry, and that just seems like massive overkill to me. I'd suggest that if a lens needs more discussion (like the Canon FD 35-70 mm AF lens, for example), a paragraph about it can be added below the table where it's initially listed. Could we merge the 35-70AF lens page here, and get rid of all those links?

Also, according to my brochure (Canon publication C-CE-1551 1086B100, copyright 1981) and the few listings I've found on the web, the 100mm f/2.0L and the non-L 150-600mm f/5.6 lenses didn't exist. I added the ones that weren't listed, but didn't want to delete the others for risk of removing legitimate information. Can we find some citations for these? Wwagner 19:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"FD" I'm pretty sure means "Full Diameter," and it refers to the aperture opening at full diameter while you focus, then stopping back down to take the shot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.141.177.124 (talk) 12:40, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with getting rid of the links and merging articles. Despite wide-spread belief: red links are not Bad Things.

I believe I got most of the information off of the Canon FD documentation project. Cburnett 01:43, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I checked all through the FD Doc Project data (wow, that's a great source!), and there is no mention of either of the lenses I mentioned above. The only hint of the 150-600 non-L is right next to a picture clearly showing the red line around the lens barrel (indication of an L lens), and the lens is referred to as an L elsewhere in the same document. Nothing I found over there mentions the 100 f/2L at all. To make a long story short, I'm gonna get rid of 'em from the page. Wwagner 23:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

== Photo of Mount

It would be nice if someone could take an upload a photo of the FD lense mount. LexieM 06:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mention what mount replaced FD

I think the introductory paragraph should tell what lens mount replaced the FD mount. Currently it's not clear to the reader if FD mount immediately precedes the latest mount type. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skarkkai (talk • contribs) 09:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Canon FD lens mount. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading search result if Canon FD is entered

If you type Canon FD into the search box on the front page it comes up as

Canon FD Lens Mount

Standard lens mount on the Canon EOS family

That links to this page, but anyone who doesn't go on will get the impression that FD lenses are suitable for the Eos range - since they aren't that isn't very helpful. I have no idea how to change this. --Marcus Rowland (talk) 10:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is still happening! --Marcus Rowland (talk) 23:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now seems to be OK - thanks to whoever fixed it --Marcus Rowland (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]