Talk:Canon 1397 §2

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism: Canon law Mid‑importance

Canon 1397 §2 is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Catholic canon law task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Date

When was this enacted? RJFJR (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Unless an act is intrinsically evil"?

Sorry if I'm wrong, but reading through the code of canon law, the text seems to suggest that the penalty of latae sententiae excommunication doesn't apply if an act is intrinsically evil and a person acts out of grave fear. Canon 1324 includes three § points, of which §1 specifies situations in which a penalty should be tempered (including grave fear specifically if an act is intrinsically evil), and of which §3 states that, in the case of any of the situations mentioned under §1, a person is not to be punished by a latae sententiae penalty. This could not be referring back to the point stating that person is not to be punished by any penalty if they act under grave fear and the act is not intrinsically evil because that section is in a different canon law and is not prefaced with §1, and because the article here would then be wrong in suggesting that the person can punished by another penalty (since specifically a person is not to be punished at all under those circumstances). The relevant portions of canon law are here, as taken from the Vatican website linked to in the article:

"Can. 1324 §1. The perpetrator of a violation is not exempt from a penalty, but the penalty established by law or precept must be tempered or a penance employed in its place if the delict was committed: 5/ by a person who was coerced by grave fear, even if only relatively grave, or due to necessity or grave inconvenience if the delict is intrinsically evil or tends to the harm of souls; §3. In the circumstances mentioned in §1, the accused is not bound by a latae sententiae penalty."

The article present here on Canon 1324 essentially says the same thing, so as of now, these two pages conflict. I'm not certain whether the article linked to in French might be incorrect, but I have decided to change this because both a page on this website and the actual canon referred to contradict the content currently present. Sorry for the long post here, but I thought that this was a significant enough change to merit an explanation. Chri$topher (talk) 01:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Canon 1398. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]