Talk:Cannon's algorithm

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Needs work

This is kind of a terrible article about Cannon's Algorithm. It talks about it at a high level, which is counter-intuitive, since anyone at that level already knows that. So basically this article is useless. This is a simple algorithm ...why isn't there a simple explanation? Why aren't there any examples? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.234.1.20 (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P_ij responsible for a_ij and b_ij

What is meant by "Initially p_i,j is responsible for a_i,j and b_i,j"? They aren't the initial values held by p_i,j, so in what sense is it responsible for them? I'm tempted to delete this sentence. LachlanA (talk) 10:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]