Talk:Cannabis ruderalis/Archives/2020/February
This is an archive of past discussions about Cannabis ruderalis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
unmerge
there was a merge proposal from 2006 which was acted upon without being discussed or otherwise mentioned. I have undid this merge/redirect and reverted to the last good article before the redirect template was added. I feel that this species likely meets the general notability guideline and deserves an entry in article space. An attempt at sourcing will be made riffic (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
work
come on, i haven't even grown these yet, you guys need to help out. i added some headings, corrected the urban legend about ruderalis being a russian word and added some citations and references. Skybone (talk) 03:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Requested move 22 March 2016
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus for what the best name might be. Discussion going on elsewhere may lead to a new proposal. (non-admin closure) Dicklyon (talk) 02:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Cannabis ruderalis → Cannabis sativa subsp. ruderalis – I hereby propose following currently accepted classifications of this taxon and move this article to describe a subspecies of Cannabis sativa.
- See The Plant List, or search through WCSP, ITIS, EoL, or CoL. It is either considered a synonym of Cannabis sativa or a subspecies. Notice the Cannabis sativa article lists ruderalis as a subspecies rather than a species.--MCEllis (talk) 05:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Cannabis indica also may need to be moved to Cannabis sativa subsp. indica or both merged into C. sativa. http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-2696472 MCEllis (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Let's try to keep discussion at Talk:Cannabis#Monotypic genus or several species.3F I suspect some merging/restructuring of articles may be better than moving. We will need to build concensus.--MCEllis (talk) 19:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:PRECISE. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 11:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Cannabis ruderalis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716182947/http://www.hightimes.com/read/5-differences-between-sativa-and-indica to http://www.hightimes.com/read/5-differences-between-sativa-and-indica
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120102013049/http://www.cannabisculture.com/v2/articles/2847.html to http://www.cannabisculture.com/v2/articles/2847.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716212239/http://hightimes.com/read/euro-grow to http://hightimes.com/read/euro-grow
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211101216/http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/3033.html to http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/3033.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)