Talk:Cannabinol

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cannabis Mid‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cannabinol.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 26 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Cvcaudill.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Linked study refers to CannabiDIOL, not Cannabinol, as an anti-psychotic and anxiolytic

The paper from the Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research that was used as a reference here refers to cannabidiol, not cannabinol. Therefore, I'm removing the references both to the paper and the conclusions erroneously derived from it. - Pacula 15:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CBN derived from hemp is legal

CBN is legal as long as it's derived from hemp which is legal under the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (“the 2018 Farm Bill”) 2600:1700:4DC0:6100:515:1510:A712:9806 (talk) 22:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From the Farm Bill, 2018: federal authorities relating to the production and marketing of hemp, defined as "the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis." Quoting: The 2018 Farm Bill, however, explicitly preserved FDA's authority to regulate products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds under the FD&C Act and section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act). FDA treats products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds as it does any other FDA-regulated products — meaning they’re subject to the same authorities and requirements as FDA-regulated products containing any other substance.

There are no FDA-approved products from hemp. CBN derived from hemp (with 0.3% THC or lower) is legal to sell as a cosmetics ingredient or for other purposes not regulated by the FDA, but cannot be sold under federal law as an ingredient in food, dietary supplement, or animal feed. I think this means CBN has no logical commercial outlet, but could be extracted from hemp for research purposes. Zefr (talk) 23:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CBN is mildly psychoactive + binds to the CB1 receptor to produce that activity + has had it's psychoactivity compared to THC

I don't know why you removed the 5 studies and stated the single 1 would be fine and then remove it altogether stating there is not enough evidence. You claimed there are no studies showing CBN binds to the CB1 receptor, but CURRENTLY the Wikipedia for Cannabinol RIGHT NOW, has it's own reference and here is another one also confirming it's psych activity compared to Delta-9-THC. So I have no idea why you would remove my references and not remove that claim if you feel it's false but it's not false, CBN binds to the CB1 receptor and produces a mildly psychoactive effect (compared to THC). https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm970126f 3230 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1997, Vol. 40, No. 20 Rhee et al Please READ the full study and not just the description - "Table 1. Binding of Various Cannabinoids to Cannabinoid Receptors" which marks "CBN (1a) 392.2 ( 53.5 ki NM = CB1)" AND "First, CBN (1a) was compared to ∆9-THC (2a). Under our experimental conditions, CBN was about 2-4 times less potent on binding to either CB1 or CB2, in contrast to the data reported by Munro et al.,9 who found that CBN and ∆9-THC are equipotent on CB2." AND "We found that CBN is about 13 times less potent than ∆9-THC"

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00965 American Chemical Society and American Society of Pharmacognosy "Receptor activity for CBN and CBV data is shown in Table 8. CBN binds to both the CB1 and CB2 receptors with 10−100-fold lower activity compared to Δ9 -THC depending on the assay and the tissue source of the receptor."

https://ncithesaurus.nci.nih.gov/ncitbrowser/ConceptReport.jsp?dictionary=NCI_Thesaurus&ns=ncit&code=C84510 The United States of America National Institute of Health "Cannabinol exerts minimal affinity for CB1 and has a weak effect on the central nervous system." Gettinglit (talk) 22:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to remove mention of CBNs oxidative byproduct under chemistry

There was no reason to remove mention of CBNs oxidative byproduct under it's chemistry section as it relates to the chemistry of CBN involving it's oxidative degration. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/6/1761 If you would like I can create and separate section just for it? Why was this removed? All of these reverts are incredibly unusual as they are clearly properly referenced if you have access to the full study. Gettinglit (talk) 22:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to remove that THC degrades to CBN

There was no reason to remove the fact that THC degrades to CBN through oxidation. https://jpharmsci.org/article/S0022-3549(15)39767-7/pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128200070000052

I understand if you disagree with "primarily through the plant" part but to disagree with that and revert to the previous entry does not make any sense because you put back "However, if cannabis is exposed to air or ultraviolet light (for example, in sunlight) for a prolonged period of time, THCA will convert to cannabinolic acid (CBNA)." which is NOT from flowers synthesis as you removed my entry for. In addition these claims have no references. Can you post a study showing THCA converts to CBNA with air and UV light? I can post a study showing THC converts to CBN with oxidation with 2 references and that gets removed? This does not make any sense. Gettinglit (talk) 22:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References needed for the claim below

"There is usually little CBN in a fresh plant. However, if cannabis is exposed to air or ultraviolet light (for example, in sunlight) for a prolonged period of time, THCA will convert to cannabinolic acid (CBNA). CBN is then formed by decarboxylation of CBNA."

This also would not be formation from the plant as you removed my THC to CBN itself claim for. This would be the result of degration from foreign influences (oxidation/hydrolysis/photodegradation) which is what you removed my additions for. Gettinglit (talk) 00:07, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 May 2022 and 6 August 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Savannaj13 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Shivamp1999, Jcaine215, Bdlogan90.

— Assignment last updated by Bdlogan90 (talk) 03:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 7 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jvnon (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Rslindse, GJaet, Denisej 2, Kekecole, JJlemus.

— Assignment last updated by JJlemus (talk) 03:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Systems Pharmacology I 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 September 2022 and 12 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mkf pm801 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Mkf pm801 (talk) 22:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]