Talk:Candy (Foxy Brown song)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: UrbanJE (talk · contribs) 00:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Okay Aoba27. Let's do it...
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Comment: This article is pretty consistent, well-written, readable and incorporates a good range of unbiased and factual information, it has less than 5% of copy-violation, and is also supported by a relevant image and sound sample. Good job Aoba47. I have some questions though, don't you think it should have a complete release date (including the day and month) in "Released" column on its infobox instead of just the year? Why it hasn't a full release date? Did you find this information? –UrbanJE (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review so far. I have added the information about the full release date with the relevant source cited. Thank you for bringing my attention to this. Aoba47 (talk) 00:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Okay! I'm confidently passing this. :D –UrbanJE (talk) 13:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)