Talk:Candidatus Pelagibacter communis

This article references a BBC news website article by Roland Pease. However, many of the words are copied verbatim from the BBC article. At work, if I read this as part of a students work, I would call them in to discuss plagiarism: are there copyright issues using text taken from BBC web pages? Celticbattlepants 15:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted the affected section (subsequent editors had altered it a bit, but it was still recognizable). For anyone in a similar situation in the future, please delete the plagiarized text immediately (or follow the procedures at WP:CP if it's the whole article) rather than mentioning it on a talk page where no one will see it for a year. DopefishJustin 02:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has the number of individuals at 10²⁸, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligotroph says 10²⁷? 59.94.143.101 (talk) 05:09, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This topic seems too important for such a short article are there no experts around which could put a few minutes into tidying up this page?

So what does the most common organism eat? Is it a cyanobacteria? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.33.24 (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pelagibacter ubique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081201014010/http://www.ebi.ac.uk:80/2can/genomes/bacteria/Candidatus_Pelagibacter_ubique.html to http://www.ebi.ac.uk/2can/genomes/bacteria/Candidatus_Pelagibacter_ubique.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pelagibacter ubique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110306080500/http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/nonvalid.html to http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/nonvalid.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable relevance

'Its discovery was the subject of "Oceans of Microbes", Episode 5 of "Intimate Strangers: Unseen Life on Earth" by PBS' - I'm not sure why we should care about that, it certainly isn't a characteristic of P. ubique. HairyDan (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]