Talk:Canberra Plaza, Singapore

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Shopping Centers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Feedback

Hi all, i am the creator of the page. do give feedbacks Quek157 (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict due to visual editor and peer review errors

Hi, this is Quek157. I got into 2 problems recently.

I had for the past 2 hours extensively cleanup the page of any COPYVIOs/ reorganized the page extensively, changed all the formats and it can be a much better work. But all gone to waste due to the visual editor switched to source editing due to edit conflict. No one is editing it with me and then I previewed a version to reconciliate the conflict but then the version is the previous version. Unknowingly, I accidentally pressed back to editing, which then is the previous version. Result: all of my 2 hours of hard work is gone, all the paraphrasing are gone and I am quite upset about it but will try to redo this. Just as in academics, I had whole copies of notes (after reading through journals as well as annals, then saved wrongly and then lost) and I had to redo the entire note once again. I apparently did not learn from this mistake but I will still try to bring the article to the better revise version which now only reside in my minds. These edits will have solved many of the below auto peer review named concerns. sigh. Now the edit in my mind is being restored after even more work. My memory is apparently good (self consolation) --Quek157 (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Peer review I did an error in editing it through it is not supposed to do so. So please ignore the previous peer review. I will sincerely hope for ideas to improve and thanks so much for all the time spent. Withdrawn peer review as auto peer review seems a lot to be done. will do these before peer review as will be better not to clog up backlog. sorry Quek157 (talk) 19:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much in advance --Quek157 (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Peer review comments

Placed here for reference

Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[?]
- Check again, resolved --Quek157 (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.^[?]
- Can't find any more images, the images now are sufficient --Quek157 (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.^[?] Specifically, an example is . KG.
- Likely error from peer reviewer software, no such things detected way beyond Quek157 (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid capitalizing words in section headings unless they are proper nouns or the first word of the heading.^[?]~~
- Check again, resolved Quek157 (talk) 12:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.^[?]~~
- Done --Quek157 (talk) 12:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]^[?]
- Done --Quek157 (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.