Talk:Canadian National 7312

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph of add an image of the complete locomotive not just its smokebox be added to this article.

Retirement

Since an edit war has the potential of breaking out, lets instead attempt to create a consensus on if it is retired or not N7o2h3 (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article should be semi-protected

These anonymous users are saying the locomotive is not retired. However, it did technically temporarily retire due to the FRA 1472-day inspection and overhaul. I suggest this article should be semi protected. Aitraintheeditorandgamer (talk) 07:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the problem of this prolonged edit war is that both appear unwilling to create accounts which makes coordinating a potential agreement less attainable N7o2h3 (talk) 04:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To Aitraintheeditorandgamer and N7o2h3. I don’t know why you both are blaming me for this, but I just want to clear this up to let you both know that I had NOTHING to do with the retirement edits, I was only trying to prevent 2601:84:8481:B5A0:E995:EC6D:1233:4312 for adding in false information of the retirement information. Plus, he’s been doing the same thing on the Strasburg Railroad article too. He keeps constantly deleting 7312 from the roster without explaining himself, he keeps saying because the engine is not in active service, it should be eliminated from the article completely, which doesn’t make any sense from him. I was also the one that requested the Strasburg Railroad arti to be protected because he keeps vandalizing it constantly. I even let N7o2h3 know that he was the one causing all this, not me. So please do the math first before you start victim blaming another user who had nothing to do with it. I really hope you understand that I didn’t cause all this. 2601:188:CC82:A030:1906:EEBE:1EB8:B5AA (talk) 15:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At no point were either of us blaming you, we are merely trying to enforce wikipedia's rules here to ensure that this argument does not continue into the future. N7o2h3 (talk) 21:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]