This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Was added by an IP address registered to the World Bank Group (doingbusiness.org is a World Bank project). In keeping with our conflict of interest and external links guidelines I've moved it here for consideration by regular editors of this article who are unaffiliated with the site. -- Siobhan Hansa21:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from Wikipedia:Help desk#Error in Canadian Business Magazine wiki..Buzzzsherman (talk) 19:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
"With a circulation of over 1.1 million as of 2003" should be "With a readership of over 1.1 million as of 2003". Circulation is about 1/11th of the readership. This is very misleading and I don't have time to figure out how to edit it myself. Please fix. Thanks. Robdriscoll11 (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Done.. looks like User:NeilN has taken the time to fix your concerns and clean up the article a bit too....Thank you NeilN !!....Buzzzsherman (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]