Talk:Canadian Bill of Rights

Canada: Law / The 10,000 Challenge Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Background

I think some references are needed to support what's said about the role of Jehovah's Witnesses (I don't contest they played a role, but want citations if we are going to give it so much weight). Also, I do not understand why it says they launched a national campaign in 1949, but submitted a petition in 1947. How could they get 625,510 signatures (5% of total population) if they hadn't yet launched a national campaign? Regardless, the whole paragraph should be altered, to be in chronological order, to a greater extend. --Rob (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

effectiveness

to the naysayers: what was so wrong with it? It laid out rights in law. Then Trudeau came along and wrote new legislation that Quebec didn't accept. And His Charter of Right and Freedoms had been a mess for the Supreme Court ever since. It is a bad document. The Bill Of Rights was never a problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.71.8.34 (talk) 21:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many Canadians agree with you. This article is full of glowing praise for the Charter, and fails to reflect that it is highly controversial, and has become a very polarizing document, with accusations of it being exploited by activist judges. There are proper Hate Crime laws in the Criminal Code, and the Bill of Rights includes Property Rights, which were left out of the Charter, therefore many regard the Charter as a step back.77Mike77 (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Canadian Bill of Rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050504204636/http://www.canadianprisonlaw.com:80/misc/billofrights.htm to http://canadianprisonlaw.com/misc/billofrights.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do territories get its full protection unlike provinces?

The article mentions it effects relative to the provinces, but we're the territories (as creations of the federal government) fully covered by the Bill of Rights, including the property rights? -- sion8 ^{talk page} 07:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]