Talk:Canadian Aviation Regulations

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spam External Links

Please stop posting links to commercial sites. Posting external links for sales purposes is not permitted in Wikipedia - they will be removed every time.

The following is Wikipedia policy:

"Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products; or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Wikipedia:Spam." Ahunt 22:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advisory Circulars

I just took a look through the new links in the Advisory Circulars section, and it would seem that as of 2008, TC is putting all of these under a single system whereby the numbering links in with the CARs. This is most obvious with the link to the Aircraft Maintenance and Manufacturing Policy Letters, which states that 2008 is the cut-off and provides a link to the new section. The other links that are listed still go to/show the original document set, but it would appear that these too will eventually be incorporated in the new system. The new link is: http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/IMSdoc/ACs/menu.htm; this section will have to be revised soon, but while the TC site is in transition, perhaps it should wait.... HiFlyChick (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me - once the existing refs no longer work we will have to track down the new locations for them. It is a good idea for TC to put them all in one place - the current system is really poor if you are looking for guidance material but aren't sure if it would be in a GAAC, MPL or CBAC. TC Regulatory Affairs had promised us this would have been done four years ago, but better late than never! - Ahunt (talk) 23:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]