This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
X-Editor added Template:Unreliable source? after a cite of True North after a sentence about a Bernie Farber tweet, with edit summary = "History: not sure about true north". I'm not sure whether that meets the template's suggested criterion "reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here". I can see that the True North article includes evidence, and apparently Mr Farber or CAHN do not shrink from suing people, so I am sure this cite is okay. However, I don't see that the True North article attributes blame to CAHN, it merely mentions that Bernie Farber is the CAHN "chair", so maybe the cited sentence doesn't belong in this Wikipedia article at all. I think yes. What do others think? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
True North seemed like more of an opinionated blog than a news website, but if the source provides evidence for its claim, then I'm fine with removing the tag. X-Editor (talk) 14:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]