Jump to content

Talk:Canada (AG) v Bedford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Valerie Scott on her way to court..jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Valerie Scott on her way to court..jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 23 March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Valerie Scott on her way to court..jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:40, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

I threw up an infobox for the Court of Appeal decision, as that is the highest level of court on these proceedings so far. Since it's pretty much anticipated this will go the SCC (there was a dissent on one issue, and will probably get leave on the other two issues given their importance), the infobox should be replaced with {{SCCInfoBox}} when that decision gets released (probably in 2013 or early 2014). Singularity42 (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

[edit]

I noticed that case was indexed at the Court of Appeal as Canada v. Bedford, rather the way it is currently presented. At the moment, I think the current title of the article is how the case is still commonly referred to. However, as with the section above, I think it should be revisited when the SCC decision is eventually released, as the current consensus on Wikipedia (and the legal community) is to use the index name at the SCC. Singularity42 (talk) 03:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

I'm concerned that many of the recent additions to this article do not have in-line citations. Additionally, a number of existing in-line citations have been removed. Let's try to keep the quality up. Pburka (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valerie Scott.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Valerie Scott.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Valerie Scott.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AmyLebovitch2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:AmyLebovitch2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:AmyLebovitch2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canada (AG) v Bedford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Canada (AG) v Bedford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Canada_(AG)_v_Bedford&oldid=1204801980"