Talk:Canada–United States softwood lumber dispute/Archives/2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Canada–United States softwood lumber dispute. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2005 comments
Possibly a mention that the illegal (according to rulings) duties have cost the BC economy millions and millions of dollars. It also looks like Canada may impose some import duties on Americian products coming into Canada. Tawker 23:15, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
ifound this page extremely useful.
--70.245.114.220 02:35, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
2006 comments
I'd say that after seeing the most recent edit, the cleanup tag should be removed. --Royalguard11 03:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- Not necessarily; the opening could be worded better and there's still a lot of non-wiki'd text. Radagast 01:08, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- I just took a shot at it. I didn't do much with the content of Lumber III A/B yet, work is needed there (eventually) to bring the day-by-day diary together in summary form. —RandallJones 09:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
On Wed Feb 15th, the WTO found in favor of the US once again, and more appeals will be on the way.
Expansion request
So, for Lumber 4, what exactly are the terms of the agreement? I heard that part of it is that Canada imposes export duties, but that's not mentioned here. Has the agreement finally been implemented since 2006? -- Beland (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Free encyclopedic public domain source (CRS report)
I'm adding Congress's CRS reports to their relevant talk pages, since they're so thorough and you can just copy-and-cite the content ... here's yours:
PS : if you can think of a better talk page for this, please copy it there
- PS : see my contribs page for a list of pages I've added CRS reports to Agradman talk/contribs 08:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)