Jump to content

Talk:Cần Thơ Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Can Tho Bridge)

Plaques

[edit]

Coordinates

[edit]

can someone post coordinates please? riffic 12:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title

[edit]

Vietnamese uses Latin characters (with diacritics), so ‘Cần Thơ Bridge’ is perfectly within the rules of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). See for example the article ‘phở’. – Kaihsu 19:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should the article "Vietnam" be changed to "Việt Nam"? The consensus of these cities and providences is that they are written in English. If you would like to make a case, I suggest you head to the Vietnam WikiProject and gather consensus for such a move. — Moe ε 19:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

‘Should the article "Vietnam" be changed to "Việt Nam"?’ is a straw man. But I will let this one pass. – Kaihsu 19:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My position is not a straw man, you're position was refuted, as "you don't have consensus for this move". — Moe ε 20:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vietnam is the English name for Việt Nam, like Vienna for Wien and Finland for Suomi. We don't have an official English name for Cần Thơ Bridge, so the diacritics should be retained. IT'S DA...Ανέκδοτο 03:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We don't? So why is every city and providence in Vietnam listed on Template:Subdivisions of Vietnam shown in an English name (including the city of Can Tho)? — Moe ε 15:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. They are all wrong. Joaopais 16:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe they are all wrong, please visit the Vietnamese WikiProject, get consensus, change them, and that will be it. — Moe ε 16:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second name listed

[edit]

If that second name is the native name, we also have an infobox bridge option for that,

| native_name      = 
| native_name_lang = 

...just in case that would fit better. - Denimadept (talk) 20:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cần Thơ Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cần Thơ Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]