Talk:Can't Catch Me Now/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 03:17, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Hey there, it's been great to work together in the past and I will review this article today! --K. Peake 07:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I never did understand why it had to wait so long since it is quite a strong article, lol.--N Ø 08:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MaranoFan: Yes it definitely is, although there are not many GA reviewers at the moment. I'm more than happy to have taken this on myself, always a pleasure to work with you! --K. Peake 09:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Infobox looks good!
"Rodrigo wrote it with" → "Rodrigo co-wrote the song with"
""Can't Catch Me Now" has lyrics" → "the song has lyrics"
Pipe Music critics to Music journalism
"The song received awards and nominations," → "The song received several awards and nominations,"
""Can't Catch Me Now" debuted at" → "the song debuted at"
Wikilink music video
Add a mention of Kelly Clarkson's cover version at the end since this is notable for the lead

Background

Retitle to Background and release
Img looks good mostly, although shouldn't it be aligned to the left per current overlap with the infobox?

I've heard some people say an image should be on the side where the person in it faces the text, and a left placement here would create a slight MOS:SANDWICH

First para looks good!
[9] should be invoked after the "character work" quote instead of the end of the sentence
Should the prose say movie or film character per this being American English?

Seems like Americans have a preference for "movie character" based on a Google search, which is what is already used here.

"playing a clip of" → "playing a short clip of" for full context
Mention the date of the 7-inch vinyl release

Composition

Retitle to Composition and lyrics
Wikilink acoustic guitar on the audio sample text
"Dan Nigro produced and" → "Nigro produced and"
"bass, mellotron; Paul Cartwright" → "bass, and Mellotron; and Paul Cartwright"

The "and" before Paul Cartwright would be unnecessary since Roan is the last item in the list.

"Randy Merrill mastered it." → "Randy Merrill mastered the song."
""Coming like a storm into your town."" → ""Come in like a storm into your town"." per the source

It's "coming" according to the official lyric video.

"final lyric with "an open, unresolved cadence" according" → "final line with "an open, unresolved cadence", according"
"they would not be captured by the latter:" this seems unclear; shouldn't it be something like "would not be able to capture them"?
"Rodrigo then sings the lyric "Coming like a storm into your town"," → "Rodrigo then sings "Come in like a storm into your town","

Critical reception

[34][8][35] should be in numerical order
Re-invoke the American Songwriter ref at the end of the first sentence quoting this review
"it also felt natural to her" → "it also felt natural of her" to avoid confusion here
The NME ref should be invoked after "haunting" instead
[28][8] should be in numerical order
"and some others described the" → "and others described the"
Make a separate sub-section for the accolades
Add a comma after 96th Academy Awards

Commercial performance

First para looks good!
"received a gold certification in" → "received gold certifications in"

Music video

Wikilink music video
[34][32] should be in numerical order

Live performances and other usage

Regarding the first live performance, add a mention of how Rodrigo introduced the song with her mention of its presence in the film

Do you mean Rodrigo saying "So, has anybody watched The Hunger Games? I was super lucky because this year I got a chance to write a song for the movie that's out now"? I don't think it adds much to readers' understanding and we should probably try to be limited with how we use quotes.

"reprised it on" → "reprised the song on"
Shouldn't you mention the musicians and singers were in the shadows?
[73][74] should both be invoked after the info on the performance setting but only [73] after the Billboard comments; same issue arises for Billboard at the Kelly Clarkson cover
"included it on" → "included the song on"
Add the mention of Clarkson's backing vocalist and instrumentalists

Credits and personnel

Capitalize Mellotron

Charts

Weekly charts

The archive url for the Austria chart does not display the song's position

Year-end charts

Pipe UK Vinyl Singles to Official Vinyl Singles Chart

Certifications

I cannot find the Polish certification on search

It shows up on searching "Rodrigo" for me instead of the song name. But I am not sure how to change the notice in the template to reflect this.

Release history

The United States release date is not backed up by the source

References

Copyvio score looks pretty good at 32.4%; ignore the 62.5% since this is not matching with anything
Ref 23 needs a publisher
Add url-access registration to ref 27

This one? I am able to access it without registration.

What exactly makes Next Best Picture a reliable source on ref 42; it seems to solely consist of contributors?
Star Tribune → Minnesota Star Tribune with the wikilink on ref 75

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; sorry this took until today, last minute plans came up yesterday! --K. Peake 09:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the speedy review, Kyle! I appreciate these even more given how bad it is at GAN nowadays... Everything should be addressed or have a reply now.--N Ø 12:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MaranoFan: Thanks for this response quickly yourself and that really means a lot, I am definitely honoured to have taken this on for ya!!! You still need to fix the instances using lyric where they should not be that I pointed out in the comp section, add registration to ref 27 since I am seeing that as a non subscriber and regarding the "Coming like" line, you should either change to "Come in like" per the source or add a note to reflect this is shown in the lyric video. Always nice to work with you of course! --K. Peake 20:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for highlighting these! All of the others should be fixed, but I can't add registration to ref 27 since I can see it without having to get a subscription. This parameter is supposed to indicate the least amount of effort a source can be viewed with, and this one is visible to some people without having to do anything so it should be left empty.--N Ø 04:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, I will let ref 27 go since this is probably an issue for me as a UK resident accessing The New York Times! --K. Peake 07:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]