Talk:Can't B Good

Can't B Good has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 6, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Janet Jackson Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Janet Jackson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Janet Jackson and associated groups or individuals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Janet JacksonWikipedia:WikiProject Janet JacksonTemplate:WikiProject Janet JacksonJanet Jackson articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

References

None of these are really up to scratch. The first is a scan of a radio add list, but we're not told where it's sourced from (and there's not sufficient information in the scan itself to work it out). The second is to a constantly updated chart, so it longer proves the claim re when the song debuted. The third could easily be replaced with the Billboard page for Janet's chart activity, which is a more reliable source. Can anyone clarify the nature of the scan or provide a better source for either of the first two footnotes? Gusworld (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Shouldn't the Bubbling Under peak be deleted as now the song has made it onto the chart that it was bubbling under? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chael39 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Island considering dropping.....

There is no reference to this and should be deleted.Chael39 (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Chael39[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Can't B Good/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HĐ (talk · contribs) 13:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll review this article shortly! Simon (talk) 13:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"...as the fourth and final single from Discipline, on March 18, 2008" --> remove the comma
"... who deemed it for being smooth, tender and lovely" --> I'd prefer "praised"
"...picking the song" --> and picked

Background and composition

"Even though not writing by herself" --> Although Jackson didn't write the song
"...R&B "smooth and jazzy" ballad" --> "smooth and jazzy" before R&B
"Janet Jackson" --> Once you mentioned the full name you should only mention the last name consequently

Reception

" Allmusic" is now "AllMusic"
Unitalicized BBC Music
"...but due to its lack of melody, failed to do so" --> but failed to do so due to...
I can see that you use to much "of", replace them with "writing for", "from"... or something else

Remix, charts, credits

Fine

Source review

Ref #1 should be AllMusic, not Allmusic, and the publisher is All Media Network
Ref #9 unitalicized Digital Spy
Ref #16 unitalicized BBC News
Refs #17 and #18 are not employ with the other refs' dates. Fix it

Overall

On hold Simon (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Alex ^{talk page!} 04:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. Simon (talk) 09:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Can't B Good. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://uk.launch.yahoo.com/080304/33/21y8r.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/music/ny-etdrops5590607feb26,0,3889834.column?track=rss

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]