Jump to content

Talk:Camp Landing Entertainment District

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

While I do appreciate receiving site visits from this Wikipedia article, you did not correctly cite your source. Instead, you posted it as a link, but if you could, add my site as a correct and proper citation.

Thanks. —This unsigned comment was added by 67.20.62.64 (talkcontribs) .


Deletion! Why?

[edit]

Why would this article be considered for deletion? It is a marginally defunct shopping mall. While it has seen recent improvements, it has a long way to go. If reasons for possible deletion could be given maybe the issues could be addressed. Campaigner444 18:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. The submitter of the deletion notice failed to inform the readers and contributors of what exactly the reason was, hiding behind acronyms that produced no real results. Instead, there should have been bullet points listed with specific details. Seicer 18:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To add, this mall is considered part of the Dead Malls project. The Kyova Mall itself is still considered distressed, as it has an 80% vacancy rate and is still very much struggling. Even if it comes out of its slump (that it has been in for over 10 years), the article is still worthy of the Dead Malls project for that same purpose, in that it was formerly a distressed property revitalized under several new projects. I don't think I can be any more specific over this article than what I discussed and outlined. It fits Wikipedia's standards, fits the Dead Malls project description, and is an approperiate submission. Seicer 18:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons and discussion concerning this deletion are at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyova Mall. I also tried to explain any excess jargon I used there, I hope that this explaination was sufficiently explicit for you. Inner Earth 18:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Result Notice

[edit]

This article was the subject of an AfD discussion closed on 6 July 2006. The result was No Consensus/default keep. Xoloz 17:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kyova Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:37, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That link goes nowhere due to robots.txt, and I've find no other way to find the original page, but someone has already indicated that it simply is a dead link. -Fuzzy (talk) 18:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Kyova Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]