Talk:Cameroon Armed Forces

Africa Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: National / African

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	African military history task force

Numbers

What are these numbers supposed to mean?

Panhard AML-90 90mm 4x4 ARVs-31 + 10

31 in service plus 10 retired? 31 bought initially then 10 bought later? Or something completely different? It's not clear to readers; if anybody know what it's supposed to mean, spell it out. If not, delete it. bobrayner (talk) 21:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Someone has been adding random vehicles to this section. Last time I checked, Cameroon didn't have Abrams, Leclerc, Leopard, or any other modern MBT. I have reverted the page to the last correct version. --DraconianDebate (talk) 04:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continued False and misleading information in this article

Cameroon never had or will have Heavy MBTs in their forces, No Abrams, Leopard 2, M84. nor do they have the numbers of Missle/Artillery/APC/Vehicle systems stated in previous edits, they dont have enough forces to operate them. I have corrected what i know to be accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lima25218 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cameroon actually has a military personnel of over 40,000 - 60,000 men. 12,500 only represents the National Gendarmerie. Unique237 (talk) 08:51, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Unique237 That isn't what the current source for the numbers says, so it would be good if you could provide a reliable source for that. Tristario (talk) 09:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cameroonian Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150209022905/http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/actions-france_830/defense-securite_9035/cooperation-securite-defense_9037/revue-freres-armes_12582/freres-armes-258-dossier-cameroun_18857/dossier_19041/armee-terre_64741.html to http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/actions-france_830/defense-securite_9035/cooperation-securite-defense_9037/revue-freres-armes_12582/freres-armes-258-dossier-cameroun_18857/dossier_19041/armee-terre_64741.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cameroonian Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303225331/http://www.africansecuritynetwork.org/site/components/com_medialibrary/emedia/Cameroons%20Security%20Apparatus%20Actors%20and%20Structures.pdf to http://www.africansecuritynetwork.org/site/components/com_medialibrary/emedia/Cameroons%20Security%20Apparatus%20Actors%20and%20Structures.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]