Talk:Camborne School of Mines

Cornwall High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Article rating

I have rated this article as High importance, but have a niggling feeling that it could qualify as Top importance. In the world of Mining Engineering, CSM is an institution of world class and renown, but of course to anyone unfamiliar with the discipline it may seem like an obscure provincial college. Any thoughts? The article does need work, particularly references establishing CSM's position in the mining world. DuncanHill (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merger of Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines into Camborne School of Mines

It has been proposed to merge the Associateship article into the main article for CSM. Comments and thoughts below please:

Neutral I have no strong feeling either way, but the ACSM article does need references supporting its standing in mining engineering circles. I suspect that these are more likely to be found in print sources rather than online. DuncanHill (talk) 01:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
merge they are simply two sides of the same coin; it is difficult to see how the associate article could serve any useful purpose that would not be better served by inclusion in the main article. Abtract (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
status quo There a great deal of info that could be added to the Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines page. The Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines is inderpendant from the school and university and as a result would be better off on its own.Cheveney (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: While they are technically separate, the Associateship would not exist without its parent. Either way, I'm breathing some life into this discussion, as it's been dead since early 2008 (and working since 2007). -- Matthew Glennon (^T/_C\^D) 17:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since all the content from that article has been in this one for several years now, and that is and was likely to remain, an unreferenced stub, I've converted it into a redirect, per the above proposal. —SMALL JIM 23:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repair University Infobox

I have repaired the infobox following the loss of the CSM crest, I have uploaded a copy of the crest that I created back in 2003 when I was a student at the school Cheveney (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Camborne School of Mines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090822190426/http://csmsa.co.uk:80/ to http://www.csmsa.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]