Talk:Cambaytherium

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

higher taxon name

Technically Cambaytherium did not belong to the crown-group Perissodactyla, but I don't believe there is a name for the clade Perissodactyla+Cambaytherium. Perissodactylomorpha I guess? DaMatriX 16:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Is the name Perissodactylomorpha suggested in the paper? If not, we only can wait for a formal proposal of a new clade for the group of Cambaytherium (there is not a family called Cambaytheriidae?) and perissodactyls in the literature.--Rextron (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]