Talk:CalorieKing

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

untitled

I think that this page should be deleted, because it's written like an advertisement!

I just removed excess information from this page, it seems much better now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.166.227.146 (talk) 21:08, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

I am removing the orphaned article tag, as I have converted references to calorieking.com and calorieking.com.au on other pages on WikiPedia to also contain links to this article where relevant --WarrenGuy (talk) 07:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a good deal of additional advertising-style talk, such as multiple mention of the company's name and of its products. But there seem to be to external third-party reliable sources for the information, only the company's press releases and web sites. They are acceptable as external links, in moderation, but not as references. Some mentions from the press would help, including a review of the book. I think the company is very possibly notable, but it needs to be shown by such references. (I noticed this article, by the way, in coming from the Nutrition page, which is one of the several hundred I regularly patrol for spam links.) DGG (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that links have been added to this article or to the company web site from a number of fast-food restaurant chains, and some food products. The food products links are obviously excessive, and have been removed. For the chains, it is just possible that the nutritional information is of some value, since the links are to specific lists of that company's food products on the site. I left them in, as an exception. I invite other opinion on this. DGG (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that the conflict of interest tag is removed from this page - the page seems to have been quite heavily reworded by other users since it was added and it's been nearly 2 years? Any objections? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.23.245.86 (talk) 11:48, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]