Talk:Callichirus major
Appearance
A fact from Callichirus major appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that vestigial organs in Brazilian Callichirus major population have suggested Callichirus to be the only crustacean genus with basal, yet not universal, hermaphroditism?
- ALT1:... that the Callichirus major ghost shrimp has been endangered due to its extraction for living fishing bait?
- ALT2:... that the Callichirus major ghost shrimp taxon, originally thought to denote a single species, was discovered to include at least four?
Created by Leefeni de Karik (talk). Self-nominated at 18:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC).
- @Leefeni de Karik: ghost shrimp is a disambiguation page. Could you replace the references in the ALT hooks with the correct link? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Main, ALT1 and AL2 all okay - I prefer the main hook Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Size
[edit]So how big is this beast? --''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 02:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Species complex in speciesbox
[edit]I set up the speciesbox (after doing the higher taxonomy) this morning. The rank "species_complex" doesn't register - so I substituted subgenus - but this probably isn't quite right ... suggestions? Roy Bateman (talk) 13:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)