Talk:Call Me Karizma

Call Me Karizma was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 16, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Call Me Karizma article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

[1]
[2]

Note for other editors

The subject has been accussed of sexual assault allegations according this source [3] but I currently do not think it is WP:DUE for this WP:BLP at this current time unless more coverage emerges. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 22:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Call Me Karizma/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 22:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

While it is possible to write a short good article, I'm afraid that this one needs more work before it can qualify.

My two biggest worries are with the prose and with the broadness. More than quick fixes, the article is written in proseline. The way in which the article is formatted is very "on X date, Y happened", which may be in part due to that lack of broadness in coverage; there isn't much going on besides those cut and dry facts. Normally, I'd do some work of my own to point you in the right direction, but there just... isn't anything to go on. I tried the Google.

Tl;dr: it's not you, it's the subject. Maybe when he takes off, there'll be something there for a GA. For what it's worth, the subject does pass GNG. — Ghost River 22:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: From my understanding I thought that crietrion 3. means it is to be broad in coverage of the avaliable reliable sources. If no more RSs can be found than as long as its broad enough of those avaliable, with an article that meets GNG it can still meet the criteria. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 21:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources,

Hi, been looking at this due to the talk at GAN. I found a couple sources when looking. No idea if they are high quality or not, so feel free to dismiss them: [4],[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] . Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lee Vilenski: Thanks for linking these, some of these seem like they could be reliable and worth using. But I will probably need to familiarise and vet said sources before adding them as I do not know many of these. Thanks. Regards Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 23:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]