Talk:California newt

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	California newt is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 31 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fitzgeraldk980.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pets

How come there is no mention of their being kept as pets? I, in fact, have one (didn't buy it, got it from my science teacher, who in turn got it from another student). At least, it sure looks like a California Newt. Could it be some kind of strange lookalike?

As far as toxicity goes, I'm a little confused about how doom-and-gloom the article is. I would assume that they are like the Poison Dart Frogs and lose their toxicity in captivity. Either that, or the danger is only in eating the animal (not with touching it or its water) such as with Fugu. People keep Pufferfish in their aquariums all the time and don't seem to get sick or anything. I do take commonsense precautions as with handling any amphibian, but neither me nor any of "Isaac Newt"'s previous owners has ever had any bad reaction to it. If they are, in fact, common in the pet trade, that should be mentioned (most of the pet stores I go to don't have much in the way of amphibians).

Stonemason89 01:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I noticed the article Taricha states that these newts are only toxic to humans if ingested (for the most part) and that they are also common pets. Still, I think at least some note of that should be made on this page as well. Stonemason89 15:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct capitalization?

The article is titled California Newt, but the second word is in lowercase in the article. Which is correct?--ShelfSkewed Talk 14:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source 4 DOI not working

I cannot get the doi for source 4 to redirect properly. The correct DOI should be https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00469.x. Ths17sbu21 (talk) 19:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sisyphus9, Dombroesel1 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Dombroesel1 (talk) 17:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]