Talk:California Victim Compensation Board

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright

This article appears to have been copy and pasted from here. Copyright is stated on the page in question, however this states: In general, information presented on this web site, unless otherwise indicated, is considered in the public domain. I leave it to someone more clued up than me to decide if this is an issue. Also please see Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board , an almost identical article. ascidian | talk-to-me 13:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged it as public domain in spite of the conflicting messages of the "c" tag on the source and the "ownership" release at its "conditions of use" page. That conditions of use seems to be governing there. The "copyright" tag is on every page and so does not seem specifically to apply. I've invited review of my decision at WT:C. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources to demonstrate notability

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Toohool (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]