Talk:California State Route 905/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about California State Route 905. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Exit numbers
Are the proposed exit numbers from a Caltrans document, or just guessed? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 20:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Siempre Viva
Has the interchange with Siempre Viva north of the Otay Mesa Port of Entry been completed yet? I have it marked as unconstructed... --Geopgeop 05:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Demotion
So... where's the actual route description, as opposed to what people want the road to do? --Rschen7754 09:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 905/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 15:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article today. TCN7JM 15:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright, I have insufficient time to review the whole article right now, but I must ask why the mileage is missing for two intersections, one of which is open. TCN7JM 15:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- This is in the part of the highway that just opened, and Caltrans has not posted the postmiles. --Rschen7754 18:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Caltrans posted the missing postmiles. Fritzzzh (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, after reading through the remainder of the article, I found nothing of major concern. Thanks to Fritzzzh for finding the missing postmiles. I will pass this article without a hold. Good job! TCN7JM 14:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Caltrans posted the missing postmiles. Fritzzzh (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
From --Rschen7754
This is a part of the California State Highways Wikipedia Project, and this page needs to be called California State Route 905! DO NOT change it!
- Well, until Interstate 905 is complete. From Kevon kevono talk on April 25, 2016 8:29 PM (PT) (Idc I'm doing this incorrectly.) —Preceding undated comment added 03:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- This comment was written over 10 years ago, so it can be ignored.
--Rschen7754 04:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- You can delete it. From Kevon kevono talk on April 26, 2016 3:44 PM (PT) (Idc I'm doing this incorrectly.) —Preceding undated comment added 22:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- This comment was written over 10 years ago, so it can be ignored.
Map Issue
There's no SR 11 on the map, which was built in March 2016. The map needs to be replaced. Kevon kevono (talk) 20:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC) (What the hell is UTC?) 13:35 (PT)
- So? Lots of maps don't show every route. –Fredddie™ 14:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Interstate 905
Uncertain enough if this is just a prediction. I-905 isn't going to be build right away. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:749A:74E0:F319:7EC3 (talk) 03:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
I-905 designation in relation to I-5
Is there anyway to say that I-905 would make I-5 one of the few interstates to utilize all its auxiliary route numbers? ChessEric 22:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- It can be stated if a reliable source states that fact. Otherwise, no. 75.99.68.66 (talk) 23:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)