Talk:California State Route 65/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about California State Route 65. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Trivia
The last time I was down there, there were two signs (pun intended) of SR-65 on Sunrise Boulevard (former proposed route) in Sacramento County north of Jackson Highway. On the west side of the road there was a Highway 65 marker, and on the east side there was a controlled access highway sign. I have not been there for a while and do not know if they are still there. Jim 23:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I read about that.
"The interchange of US 50 with Sunrise Blvd. is larger than normal, because Sunrise Blvd was, for a short time in the 1970s, designated as Route 65 south of US 50 in anticipation of the freeway routing. This route was relinquished in 1976. On one of the piers for the overcrossing, you can see where it used to call the structure "50/65 separation." The interchange was a cloverleaf until around 2001, when it was converted to a partial cloverleaf."
From http://www.cahighways.org/065-072.html#065
On another note, I think it'd be great if somebody knew the routing through Roseville, California pre-1990 or whenever they built the actual freeway. I know that Washington Blvd was used and according to I-80's article page, the Riverside Ave exit used to be for SR 65. But I still don't know how it goes through the historic downtown part of Roseville. -Killiondude (talk) 06:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- After heading north on Riverside Avenue, the old route for SR 65 headed northeast on Vernon Street, made a right turn onto Grant Street for one block, a left turn onto Oak Street for another block and finally a left turn onto Washington Boulevard, which passes under Vernon Street via a tunnel. –PhATxPnOY916 (talk to me) 01:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Future Road tag
Would it be better to use {{future road|section}} and place the tag in the "North segment" subsection? Killiondude (talk) 06:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on California State Route 65. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121014034335/http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/products/Named_Freeways.pdf to http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/products/Named_Freeways.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)