Talk:California State Route 60

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 60 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / California Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. Highways
Locations	California
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Viewpoint Evaluation

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The History is very overrepresented, most of the article is mentioning the history of the Route 60. Underrepresentation can be argued amongst the information on the actual planning and engineering of the infrastructure. Such as the information on the actual plan, science, and funding of the project.

Tonylopez3 (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Tonylopez3[reply]

I think it’s, to some extent, fine because the construction of the route isn’t significant compared to the route history itself. Kevon kevono (talk) 03:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]