Talk:California State Route 55/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 23:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

• Will review. I know this road! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

review

• "below-grade freeway " - what does this mean?
  • Linked. --Rschen7754 23:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
• there are sone bare urls used as citations. e.g. [1], [2] and [3] These need to be formated.
• I have made a few edits which you are free to change: [4]
• That's all. Good work, and on hold.

MathewTownsend (talk) 23:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Should be good now. --Rschen7754 00:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

reply - just a little more

• lede

• Due to congestion, several alternatives are being discussed to expand the freeway portion past its current end in Newport Beach.

• what is the time frame for "everal alternatives are being discussed to expand the freeway portion "

• See below. --Rschen7754 20:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

• History

• "In April 2007, the Orange County Transportation Authority approved funds to study the feasibility of extending the Costa Mesa Freeway south to 17th Street via tunnels or flyover ramps."

• Is this the "alternatives ... being discussed" in the lede?
• what is the outcome of this study, since this is over five years later?

• Yes, they're the same. Do you think I should be more specific in the lead? I didn't want to verbatim copy it... --Rschen7754 20:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

• citations

• This citation still needed fixing:[5]
• I attempted to fix it but it's not quite the format you've been using. Might want to check it.

• Fixed, but generally citation formatting is left to FAC. --Rschen7754 20:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

• I also linked flyover. ok?
  • Should be fine. --Rschen7754 20:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

MathewTownsend (talk) 13:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for fixing. Article passes all GA criteria. GA pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 01:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)