Talk:California State Route 188/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 17:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
See comment section below.Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]- Reference number 1 is not working. Fix it or delete it. I will pass the article once this issue is resolved. Everything else in the article is good.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed; we can thank Microsoft for making a new XLSX format. :/ --Rschen7754 17:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
The article will be on hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)