Jump to content

Talk:California State Route 149/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    In the History, it describes a past construction project in future tense.
    Done. --Rschen7754 10:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • In the route description, is it possible to mention how many lanes SR 149 is and whether or not it is a divided highway?
    • What kind of rural features does it pass? Farms? Woods?
    Not done; I think the article's specific enough. --Rschen7754 09:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • In the route description, indicate the termini are interchanges.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for some minor fixes. Dough4872 02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to need at least a few days. I just noticed that there are some dead links that need to be dealt with. --Rschen7754 22:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I tried to get the dead links resolved; one remains. Got everything else except for one that I disagree with. --Rschen7754 08:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Once the remaining dead links are taken care of I will pass the article. Dough4872 19:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, according to the external links too these links are dead but they came up for me. Therefore, I will pass the article. Dough4872 20:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]