Talk:California Diamond Jubilee half dollar/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 04:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. I'll try to start the review in the next couple of days, thanks. Moisejp (talk) 04:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No disambiguation links. Not totally sure if the external links tool is working, but it doesn't seem to be showing any problems. Moisejp (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I have corrected a handful of minor punctuation/grammar issues. Otherwise, the prose is very good and readable.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All statements are attributed to reliable-looking sources. All of the sources are printed ones, which I do not have access to. However, in good faith, I presume the nominator has accurately used these sources and has not added original research.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It is broad in its coverage and focused.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
The article is neutral and does not display any biases.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is stable. No edit wars.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
There are four images, three of which are public domain, and one is the author's own work. The images are appropriately captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This is a very nice article that meets the requirements of GA. Congratulations and great work! Moisejp (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.