Talk:California Agriculture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Quanhuynh96. Peer reviewers: KPrasad.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

I removed the following text from the article:

Silver Award for Technical Publications for ‘Unequivocal’: How climate change will transform California (2010)
Bronze Award for Electronic Publications for California Agriculture Online (2010)
Silver Award for Editing for Innovative outreach promotes sustainable winegrowing in Lodi (2009)
Silver Award for Technical Publications for Examining obesity: What should we eat? (2008)
Gold Award for Editing for When crop transgenes wander in California, should we worry? (2007)

The links provided go to the articles that were awarded, but do not give an independent reliable source for the fact that these awards were given. Once that has been done, these can been added back to the article. --Crusio (talk) 15:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is peer reviewer from ESPM 163. For this article, a lot of the article's issues are largely structural and depth related. One, I'd recommend authors to research the format of current popular science journals (i.e. Nature '[1]' and Science '[2]'). Furthermore, more background on the journal is needed. General facts on the readership and the impact would be useful. KPrasad (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]