Jump to content

Talk:California's 15th congressional district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

West of San Jose?

[edit]

The article text differs from what the map shows. Is this leftover cleanup from a redistricting?


The map is correct, and the text mirrors the old district from before 2013. It can be edited by copying the information from: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/CA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:4900:1960:9D74:2A83:AD11:AA4D (talk) 05:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates' websites & 2008 campaign

[edit]
Moved from User_talk:markles

Markles-

I'm Peter Myers, the Green Party candidate for California's 15th Congressional District. I want to understand better why you have repeatedly cut information out of the entry for California's 15th Congressional District. First you deleted the names of challengers, and although I restored those, you proceeded to exclude most of the external links, including the incumbent and both challengers' websites. Why? My first reaction is to think that you favor the incumbent. What am I not understanding?

Thank you, Peter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myersforcalifornia (talkcontribs) 01:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I had made some wholesale changes to the article to make it conform to the style employed by other pages. In the process, I unintentionally dropped the 2008 election info. I have since restored it in a new place in the article.—Markles 02:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


2012 election results

[edit]

It is likely that Eric Swalwell will win, as of this hour. but, we have no confirmation of this. i have added hidden text to his redirect, which can be turned into an article as soon as we get a reliable source. if, of course, a wild card is played and Stark remains the congressman, this hidden text can be removed. i wanted to note this so that no one else tries to create an article, only to discover its already created and ready to go.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on California's 15th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on California's 15th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on California's 15th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]