Talk:Calcitonin

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xchapa1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

While not versed in pharmacology, I do understand a fair amount of physiology. I had remove parathyroid tissue to correct an imbalance of calcium (Dr's diagnosis) and have been told it wasn't the correct tissue that was removed. Can anyone explain this?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.81.87.73 (talk • contribs) Patandmike

What was the imbalance you had? -- Boris 10:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperparathyroidism#Primary -- PErdos (talk) 03:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Effects of Calcitonin in Counteracting PTH

The article states, "It acts to reduce blood calcium (Ca2+), opposing the effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH)," and, "In many ways, calcitonin has the counter effects of parathyroid hormone (PTH)."

The article on PTH has pretty good explanations of the processes by which PTH affects serum calcium. This article on calitonin suggests that calcitonin opposes the effects of PTH. Does this happen by blocking PTH receptors, or by some other process(es)?

An explanation similar in detail to the parathyroid hormone article, with reference(s) to online medical research or review articles, would be greatly appreciated.

Leeirons (talk) 16:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A related question... the article states that calcitonin is involved in "Vitamin D regulation." Is this by way of the effect on PTH (in transient: calcitonin increases → bone calcium loss decreases → serum calcium decreases → PTH increases → vitmain D 1,25 increases), or does calcitonin have its own, more direct effect on vitamin D?

Leeirons (talk) 17:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calcitonin effects on Calcium reabsorption by the kidney tubules

That's what the article says:

Inhibits Ca2+ and phosphate reabsorption by the kidney tubules[7]

Though the very references number 7 ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9058369 ) says: "It is concluded that in man calcitonin like PTH is a renal Ca- and Mg-conserving hormone."

So according to PubMed's most recent researchs even though calcitonin's action is to reduce calcemia, it's effect on the kidney tubules is to actually enhance Ca2+ reabsorption.

--Nimorn (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent research may show that Ca2+ is reabsorbed in the kidney, but it is by no means an established fact and should not be included as factual in the article. Established textbooks such as Rhoades and Bell: Medical Physiology and BRS Physiology, which was already cited, say that Ca2+ is not reabsorbed in the kidney. The article cited is useful but by no means evidence of a complete contradiction of knowledge which has already been established. I've never changed a wikipedia article so I'll leave that to more experienced users, but it should be made clear in the article that although recent research may be in contradiction, when a med student takes their board exam, the kidney will DECREASE reabsorption of Ca2+ in response to calcitonin.

"In the kidneys, CT decreases the tubular reabsorption of calcium and phosphate. This leads to an increase in urinary excretion of both calcium and phosphate and, ultimately, to decreased levels of both ions in the plasma." from Rhoades and Bell Medical Physiology 2009

--72.88.239.221 (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Must agree with the above. Numerous current medical texts (Martini and Nath: Anatomy and physiology 2009; Rhoades and Bell: Medical Physiology 2009) maintain the traditional view that Calcitonin effects an increase in renal Ca++ excretion. It should be noted that both the Rhoades text, as well as Marieb/Hoehn (Human Anatomy and Physiology 2010) stress that the influence of Calcitonin on Ca++ homeostasis appears to be minor, especially with regard to renal reabsorption. Wiki article should be revised to reflect scientific consensus and current medical practice, rather than outdated fringe research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.177.106 (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Printing problem

Sorry if this isn't the place for formatting issues. This page is horribly broken in print at the moment. Something in the image/chemical data box in the right column blows up two pages of printing. I'd fix it if I knew anything about Wikipedia printing formats. It appears fine for display, just broken in print. Unitsquarehead (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Calcitonin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081006132959/http://www.lib.mcg.edu/edu/eshuphysio/program/section5/5ch6/s5ch6_26.htm to http://www.lib.mcg.edu/edu/eshuphysio/program/section5/5ch6/s5ch6_26.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.lib.mcg.edu/edu/eshuphysio/program/section5/5ch6/s5ch6_24.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.lib.mcg.edu/edu/eshuphysio/program/section5/5ch6/s5ch6_24.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Calcitonin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Calcitonin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160515193445/http://www.kurtis.it/abs/index.cfm?id_articolo_numero=3037 to http://www.kurtis.it/abs/index.cfm?id_articolo_numero=3037

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]