Talk:Caipira dialect

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caipira dialect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080205165808/http://www.biblio.com.br/Templates/AmadeuAmaral/modialetocaipira.htm to http://www.biblio.com.br/Templates/AmadeuAmaral/modialetocaipira.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That chart contains possibility or definately innacurate information

The source of the information of the caipira portion of the chart isn't cited Also it doesn't mention some pronounciations in the SP and RJ, coda r can be realized as [ɾ], [ʀ], [ɹ], [χ], [x], [h] and maybe more, the mentioned were only the first two, also /ow/ can be realized as [ow] not just as an [o], non-stressed /o/ being more closed, more like [u], is a feature of some(most?all???) paulista-accents, so [puɾˈke] is also possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semantism (talk • contribs) 09:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]