Talk:Caelum/GA1

GA Review

Article Passed GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ТимофейЛееСуда (talk · contribs) 15:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I will be reviewing this article for whether it meets Good Article Criteria. My initial review will be followed by a prose review and I expect that to be up in the early hours of tomorrow (UTC). -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Wow! This article is very well written, and is most definitely GA-quality.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
I am happy to pass this article as it meets all of the criteria of being a Good Article. I have one suggestion, however, that the caption for the image of the constellation include information about where it was taken or where it can be seen from. If you don't have any specifics, I would suggest adding that it can be seen from the southern hemisphere. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]