Talk:Cadherin-1

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Citation overkill

Is there anyone who can cleanup this (which has been up for over a decade)? Three citations for proving a single point might be OK, perhaps even five, but seriously, twenty-three?! (yes, I counted.) I could clear this myself, but it's physically painful to even navigate through the walls of text, let alone ~~to check which are relevant and which are not~~ dealing with subsequent cite errors (edited 00:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)), and visual editing doesn't help either. Regards, 223.17.177.154 (talk) 14:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to "E-cadherin"

I noticed that this page was moved from "CDH1 (gene)" the "Cadherin-1" with the reason being that this is the preferred protein name. It is not. The mammalian literature all refer to the protein as "E-cadherin". I agree with not using "CDH1" because it is ambiguous, but I would prefer to see each of the cadherin pages named for their common protein names; i.e., E-cadherin, N-cadherin, P-cadherin, VE-cadherin, etc., since that is how they appear in the literature. Mdonken (talk) 17:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]