Talk:Cade Skywalker

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Star Wars

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 May 2009. The result of the discussion was merge to List of Star Wars characters#S.

"On May 2, 2006, on a TFN thread about Cade Skywalker, author John F. Ostrander revealed that Cade is Anakin reborn and Vader's pants was meant to be the clue." -- Are we sure this is not a joke? Because saying something like this when they are otherwise trying to keep the whole series under a veil of secrecy just smacks of taunting the fanboys. StarNeptune 07:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

um, a quick question

okay, so we know that Ben had a son, Kol, and Kol had a son, Cade, who is acting all crazy right now, and that is to be suspected because his dad is kinda dead. what i want to know is who the heck did Ben tie the knot with to have Kol in the first place and, in the same aspect, Kol for Cade? ^_^ an update would be great because i live in nowheresville and we don't get to read those cool star wars comics and GN a whole heck of a lot.

has it been stated that Cade is Ben's grandson? there could have been any number of generations between Ben and Cade

bigger than ben

Can anyone tell me why this guy who has only appeared in one novel breifly, has a bigger article than ben skywalker, a pivotal character in several?

He appeared in 17 issues of Star Wars: Legacy comic. 58.8.83.146 (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updating

Adding some more info based on the last several Legacy comics.

TotalTommyTerror 17:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In-universe

Anyone seriously interested in improving the article should consider adding some real world related info, e.g. regarding the concept, creation, and/or function of the character within the Star Wars narrative etc. Please consult our writing about fiction guideline, which also includes a list of exemplary articles.

There are currently three featured articles on Star Wars characters: Palpatine, Padmé Amidala, and Jabba the Hutt. What sets them aside from most of the other SW character articles is the effort to write from the real world perspective. Pay particular attention to paragraphs like Jabba the Hutt#Concept and creation, Palpatine#Concept and creation, and Padmé Amidala#Characterization.

Also take a look at Darth Vader, which despite its lack of reliable, published third-party secondary sources features interesting sections on e.g. #Character creation and concepts and Darth Vader as a #Cultural figure.

Even though reliable sources may be tough to come up with, any effort to introduce coherently written real world aspects will be greatly appreciated, because it contributes to the depth of the article and accurate coverage of the topic, and thereby makes for an improved reading experience and increases the encyclopedic value of the article.

—AldeBaer 13:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Redirect

This is mostly in-universe plot summary, with no citations to third-party sources to establish notability. I am redirecting this to List of Star Wars characters. Please feel free to add there any sort of that real-world/development stuff, but only if cited to sources. --EEMIV (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect was reverted. I eagerly await the reverting's explanation of why, and/or in what way it has addressed the sourcing and notability issues. --EEMIV (talk) 13:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it has addressed the issue of your unilaterally blanking & redirecting pages. posting a comment on the talk page while blanking & redirecting does not make it a legitimate practice. if you have problems with an article, then follow procedure in fixing them. you know so much about WP, i would expect you to know how to apply it. Lx 121 (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, what I did was quite fine. When people disagree with a redirect, they enter into WP:BRD. However, you've offered no content-based rationale for restoring this article, instead trying to make a misguided and uninformed point. *sigh* Another AfD to sit through. Well, whatever. --EEMIV (talk) 13:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re accidental blanking of talk page

sorry that was an error; i was trying to revert eemiv's unilateral blanking & redirect of the article page, but i seem to have tripped over something in between checking the talk page & reverting the article. presumably i was on the talk page history when i reverted, but i'm not sure how? the redirect link kept sending me to the wrong place, so i might have hit "back" one time too many.

didn't realize it had blanked until eemiv commented on it

Lx 121 (talk) 13:49, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]