Talk:Cadcorp

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

[Untitled]

This entire page reads like an advert to me!

78.147.28.82 (talk) 22:57, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This IP does not currently respond to nslookup, However the last route was in the vicinity of Danvers, MA.,the location of ESRI northeast operations. What's Jack afraid of? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougcmorrill (talk • contribs) 02:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The older page was a copy/paste from an ex-employee. Wiki has been updated and improved, I think you'll agree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamFox (talk • contribs) 14:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the page is fine as it is now. It is factual without being a marketing spiel. I think the main page should have the warning removed. pdwalker (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cadcorp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606010113/http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/manageCompany.do?action=viewCompdetails&sourcePage=search&compId=272 to http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/manageCompany.do?action=viewCompdetails&sourcePage=search&compId=272

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]